Skip to content

The Monitor Progressive news, views and ideas

How many teachers is your school set to lose? Calculate it here.

February 4, 2020

2-minute read

Previously, we have examined the board-by-board impact of larger class sizes and mandatory e-learning in Ontario schools. One blog estimated the number of teaching positions that will be eliminated in each board as a result of policies approved in Spring 2019; the other blog recalculated figures in response to Education Minister Stephen Lecce’s offer, during contract negotiations with teachers, to scale back the changes. (At time of writing, these offers haven’t been accepted or approved). 

This blog provides a calculator that allows us to estimate, using total enrolment numbers, the number of teaching positions that will be eliminated in each school should the current plan be fully implemented. 

Before using the calculator, please read the explanations and caveats below. 

The calculator captures one change in elementary schools: the increase in class sizes in Grades 4 to 8, from 23.84 students (on average) per teacher to 24.50. 

It captures two changes in secondary schools: the increase in class sizes in Grades 9 to 12, from 22 students (on average) per teacher to 28, and the introduction of mandatory e-learning, either four courses (as approved in March 2019), or two courses (as announced in November 2019).

While the government plans to roll out these changes over the next three years, the calculator estimates the total number of teaching positions that will be eliminated once changes are fully implemented in 2023-24.

The calculator assumes a uniform 0.8 per cent enrolment growth for all schools. This is the province-wide enrolment growth rate reported by the Financial Accountability Office of Ontario (FAO). Actual enrolment projections vary from school board to school board. Since enrolment growth is built into the calculation formula, it is very important to use the number of students (total enrolment) in the 2019-20 school year; numbers from other years will distort the result. 

Other funding formula details used here were obtained from the Ministry of Education’s 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 Technical Papers. 

As with our previous board-by-board analyses, the formula behind the calculator produces results that closely mirror the FAO’s estimates. The FAO estimates 994 elementary teachers will be eliminated by 2023-24; the calculator arrives at 999 positions. The FAO estimates 9,060 secondary teaching positions will be cut; the calculator estimates 8,985 positions. The FAO total is 10,054 fewer teachers; the calculator total is 9,984 positions. This discrepancy—of less than 1 per cent—is likely due to FAO having access to more precise enrolment growth projections. 

The calculator only captures classroom teacher positions funded through the Pupil Foundation Allocation; it does not include classroom staff and education workers who are funded through other grants to provide fundamental supports to students, inside and outside the classroom.

Ricardo Tranjan is a political economist and senior researcher with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives’ Ontario office. Follow Ricardo on Twitter: @ricardo_tranjan.


Topics addressed in this article

Related Articles

Canada’s fight against inflation: Bank of Canada could induce a recession

History tells us that the Bank of Canada has a 0% success rate in fighting inflation by quickly raising interest rates. If a pilot told me that they’d only ever attempted a particular landing three times in the past 60 years with a 0% success rate, that’s not a plane I’d want to be on. Unfortunately, that looks likes the plane all Canadians are on now.

Non-viable businesses need an"off-ramp"

Throughout the pandemic, many small- and medium-sized businesses have weathered the storm, thanks to federal government help. In his deputation to Canada's federal Industry Committee, David Macdonald says it's time to give those businesses an "off-ramp".

Truth bomb: Corporate sector winning the economic recovery lottery; workers falling behind

This isn’t a workers’ wage-led recovery; in fact, inflation is eating into workers’ wages, diminishing their ability to recover from the pandemic recession. Corporate profits are capturing more economic growth than in any previous recession recovery period over the past 50 years.