The federal government is promoting the temporary foreign worker program as a solution to skill shortages now faced by employers, particularly in the West. Yet 35 per cent of the nation's temporary foreign workers are in Ontario, and almost one in five (18 per cent) are in Toronto, which has an unemployment rate of 8.6 per cent. Labour shortage? I don’t think so.
Those numbers will soon rise. Last week, the federal government announced that employers could usher in high-skilled temporary workers like engineers and electricians in 10 days instead of the current 12-14 week approval process, noting this fast-tracking will likely be extended to other categories of temporary foreign workers. But the fastest growing contingent of temporary foreign workers now are low-skilled workers, whose numbers have grown ten-fold in just five years. This category of temporary foreign workers are not the seasonal fruit-and-vegetable pickers that our nation also relies on. Low-skilled temporary workers are the people who toil year-round at Tim Horton's and Canadian Tire, in our abattoirs, nursing homes and hotels, and any workplace where employers say they can't find Canadian workers willing to work at the offered wage rates.
Disturbingly, the federal announcement also set out new wage rules which permit employers to pay temporary foreign workers up to 15 per cent below the average paid for that type of work locally, sanctioning the creation of a two-tiered "us and them" labour market.
Even if such a rule were rigorously applied and monitored -- and budget cuts may eliminate the staff to do this job -- it guarantees a downward trend in wages for everyone. Fifteen per cent below the average is a recipe for continuous decline when labour shortages are filled, as a matter of policy, by those who get paid less and are not allowed to stay long enough to ask for more.
Lower wages for most workers will not be an accidental, unintended result of this federal policy initiative. Ottawa's recently announced reforms did not include a change in the four year cap on residency for temporary foreign workers, brought into play in 2011. That rule guarantees two things: one, employers can minimize the costs of churn; and two, a permanently temporary class of workers is created, keeping wages and expectations low.
The insider/outsider ethos is also reinforced by policy design. The salute to increased use of temporary foreign workers was also not accompanied by increased quotas which the federal government sets for the number of people that provinces can nominate for fast-track citizenship. In Alberta, by the end of 2011 over 58,000 people were working under temporary foreign work permits, up from about 37,000 at the end of 2007. The province can only nominate up to 5,000 of these workers to become Canadian. The vast majority of low skilled temporary foreign workers have no avenue for permanent residency.
This latest twist in Canadian immigration policy accelerates the growth in income inequality which, left unchecked, can destabilize and disrupt the economy, society, and democratic institutions.
By positioning more temporary foreign workers as the fix for labour shortages -- a malaise that will only get worse in the coming years -- the federal government is assaulting deep-rooted values that have guided Canada's evolution as a society.
Even the Chinese railway workers of the 1800s came with "landed immigrant" status. Emphasizing the benefits of a disposable class of workers is a very recent, and unsavoury, development in our history.
This nation was built by immigrants who had a stake in its future. Together we created an economy which today is the tenth largest in the world. While the economy will continue to grow, the distribution of the gains from that growth threatens to become rapidly even more lopsided. Policies like favouring temporary foreign workers over economic immigrants means the next generation of Canadians are all but assured to have a lower standard of living than the current generation of decision-makers have enjoyed their whole lives.
As an economist, I understand cheaper labour will benefit some employers in the short term, though the longer-term results will slow purchasing power and growth.
As a Canadian, I am appalled that public policy can be boiled down to this. We are all cheapened as a result.