Skip to content

The Monitor Progressive news, views and ideas

A carbon tax comes to Alberta

April 15, 2016

3-minute read

Alberta's 2016 Budget presents its plan to price carbon, in two parts: a new Carbon Levy applied to transportation and heating fuel, at $20 per tonne of CO2 (4.5 cents per litre at the pump) starting January 2017, rising to $30 (6.7 cents per litre) in 2018; and, changes to the the Specified Gas Emitters Regulation (SGER) framework for Large Final Emitters. Combined, the government says these measures will cover 78-90% of Alberta's GHG emissions.

Let's take a look at the details. There is not much at all on the SGER piece, except that it prices emissions at $20 per tonne in 2016 and $30 in 2017 (each a year earlier than the carbon levy) for emissions that exceed an emissions target, with a new performance standard to be introduced for 2018(*). The budget doesn't plan on receiving larger revenues until 2018/19, when they are $917 million. Much will depend on what the performance targets end up being, in negotiation with industry.

The carbon pricing regime is phased in over three fiscal (April-March) years, but implemented on a calendar year basis, so I'm mostly looking at 2018/19, when the carbon pricing plan is fully phased in. In that year the Carbon Levy will raise $1.7 billion, which added to the SGER carbon pricing yields $2.6 billion in carbon pricing revenue. That's about double what BC's carbon tax pulls in: same rate of $30 per tonne, but much lower emissions, and about 3/4 of emissions covered by the tax.

The Carbon Levy itself is elegantly designed, essentially along the lines that have been proposed by CCPA for many years (Alternative Federal Budget and my work on the BC carbon tax). In particular, it is not revenue-neutral in the strict sense of the term (financing of tax cuts elsewhere), with more than 2/3 of revenues ($1.7 billion in 2018/19) going toward climate action expenditures: green infrastructure, energy efficiency, renewables, and innovation and technology. There is also a small business tax cut (rate lowered from 3% to 2%) at a cost of $200 million, and $50 million for just transition assistance in coal communities and indigenous communities.

The other big piece worth noting is a carbon credit, called a Consumer Rebate, but basically an income transfer to low- to middle-income households, an estimated $590 million in 2018/19. An individual in 2018 will get $300, a couple $450, and $45 per child up to four children. One nice touch is that a single parent with one child would get the couples rate. In terms of amounts, this regime compares very favourably to BC's low income credit, which is only $115.50 per individual and $34.50 per child (though the typical household in BC also emits fewer emissions and would pay less carbon tax).

The Alberta plan also has a higher threshold for getting the transfer/credit, meaning it reaches further up the income ladder: in 2018, for an individual it starts to phase out at $47,500, and is fully phased out at $55,000 (net income); for a couple, $95,000 and $103,750 respectively. In BC, the threshold is $32,737 for an individual to get the credit, and $38,193 for a couple or single parent.

Put this all another way, an individual Albertan below the threshold who has direct emissions of less than 10 tonnes per year would get back more from the credit than she would pay in carbon levy. Or for a family of four below the income threshold, if they have emissions less than 18.7 tonnes per year they are better off under this regime. People living and working in downtown Calgary would be better off, while those with long commutes would likely be worse off.

What's it all mean? Even fully phased in the carbon levy is not likely to have much impact on behaviour, as it is pretty modest. At 6.7 cents per litre in 2018, the levy is just over half the rate of Alberta's existing fuel tax of 13 cents per litre (although the carbon tax is also applied to heating fuels so it's a larger base). If anything, this new carbon levy merely closes some of the gap between Alberta fuel prices and the rest of Canada (every time I've been in Alberta, one of my first reactions is "OMG is gas cheap here!"). A well-designed carbon tax should continue to rise every year, which continually reinforces the price signal, but it's clear that the current government can only go so far in the prevailing political and economic climate.

The power of the carbon pricing regime is less that the price signal will encourage behavioural change, and more that it funds the green and just transition that's needed for larger emission reductions over the long term, through all of the investments noted above. That's particularly important given the present day push for more production and more pipelines, which goes in exactly the opposite direction and would dig the Alberta economy even deeper into fossil fuels.

Marc Lee is a Senior Economist with CCPA-BC. Follow Marc on Twitter @MarcLeeCCPA.

  • Original sentence modified. Thanks to Andrew Leach, from U of A, who notes that the to-be-negotiated performance standard kicks in for 2018, but there are targets for 2016 (15% reduction in emissions intensity) and 2017 (20% reduction in intensity). More SGER detail here.


Topics addressed in this article

Related Articles

Canada’s fight against inflation: Bank of Canada could induce a recession

History tells us that the Bank of Canada has a 0% success rate in fighting inflation by quickly raising interest rates. If a pilot told me that they’d only ever attempted a particular landing three times in the past 60 years with a 0% success rate, that’s not a plane I’d want to be on. Unfortunately, that looks likes the plane all Canadians are on now.

Non-viable businesses need an"off-ramp"

Throughout the pandemic, many small- and medium-sized businesses have weathered the storm, thanks to federal government help. In his deputation to Canada's federal Industry Committee, David Macdonald says it's time to give those businesses an "off-ramp".

Truth bomb: Corporate sector winning the economic recovery lottery; workers falling behind

This isn’t a workers’ wage-led recovery; in fact, inflation is eating into workers’ wages, diminishing their ability to recover from the pandemic recession. Corporate profits are capturing more economic growth than in any previous recession recovery period over the past 50 years.